Skip to content Skip to navigation

Article: Evolutionary patterns–tested with cladistics–and processes in relation to palaeoenvironments of the Upper Barremian genus Gassendiceras(Ammonitina, Lower Cretaceous)

Publication: Palaeontology
Volume: 56
Part: 3
Publication Date: May 2013
Page(s): 631 646
Author(s): Didier Bert and Stéphane Bersac
Addition Information

How to Cite

BERT, D., BERSAC, S. 2013. Evolutionary patterns–tested with cladistics–and processes in relation to palaeoenvironments of the Upper Barremian genus Gassendiceras(Ammonitina, Lower Cretaceous). Palaeontology56, 3, 631–646.

Online Version Hosted By

Wiley Online Library
Get Article: Wiley Online Library [Pay-to-View Access] |


  • ARNAUD, H.2005. The South-East France Basin (SFB) and its Mesozoic Evolution. Géologie Alpine, Grenoble, Série ‘Colloques et Excursions’, 7, 5–28.
  • ASHLOCK, P. D.1971. Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology, 20, 63–69.
  • BERT, D.2012. The Upper Barremian pro parte of the Angles stratotype (SE France). InBERT, D. and BERSAC, S. (eds). First meeting of the Research group for paleobiology and biostratigraphy of the ammonites - Communications. Boletin del Instituto de Fisiografia y Geologia, 82, 3–6.
  • BERT, D. and DELANOY, G.2000. Considérations nouvelles sur quelques représentants barrémiens de Puchelliidae Douvillé, 1890 et des Hemihoplitidae Spath, 1924 (Ammonoidea). Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Nice, 15, 63–89.
  • BERT, D. and DELANOY, G.2009. Pseudoshasticrioceras bersaci nov. sp. (Ammonoidea, Gassendiceratinae), and new ammonite biohorizon for the Upper Barremian of southeastern France. Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, article 2009/02 (CG2009_A02).
  • BERT, D., DELANOY, G. and BERSAC, S.2006. Descriptions de représentants nouveaux ou peu connus de la famille des Hemihoplitidae Spath, 1924 (Barrémien supérieur, sud-est de la France): conséquence taxinomique et phylétiques. Annales Muséum Histoire Naturelle de Nice, 21, 179–253.
  • BERT, D., DELANOY, G. and BERSAC, S.2008. Propositions pour un nouveau découpage bio-zonal ammonitique, et nouveaux bio-horizons pour le Barrémien supérieur. Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, article 2008/03 (CG2008_A03).
  • BERT, D., DELANOY, G. and CANUT, L.2009. L’origine des Imerites ROUCHADZE, 1933 : résultat d’une innovation chez les Gassendiceratinae BERT, DELANOY et BERSAC, 2006 (Ammonoidea, Ancyloceratina). Annales de Paléontologie, Paris, 95, 21–35.
  • BERT, D., BUSNARDO, R., DELANOY, G. and BERSAC, S.2010. Problems in the identity of “Criocerasbarremense Kilian, 1895 (Ancyloceratida, Late Barremian), and their proposed resolution. Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Article 2010/01 (CG2010_A01).
  • BERT, D., DELANOY, G. and BERSAC, S.2011. The Dichotomus Horizon: proposal for a new bio-chronologic unit of the Giraudi Zone of the Upper Barremian of southeastern France, and considerations regarding the genus Imerites ROUCHADZÉ (Ammonoidea, Gassendiceratinae). Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Article 2011/01 (CG2011_A01).
  • BERT, D., BERSAC, S., DELANOY, G. and CANUT, L. in press. Palaeontology, taxonomic revision and variability of some species of the genus Gassendiceras Bert et al., 2006 (Ammonitina, Upper Barremian) from southeastern France. Acta Geologica Polonica.
  • BODIN, S., GODET, A., ADATTE, T. H. and FÖLLMI, K. B.2005. Paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic changes of the northern tethyan realm during the Hauterivian–Barremian: new insight from the Angles section (SE Fance). Géologie Alpine, Grenoble, Série ‘Colloques et Excursions’, 7, 138–146.
  • BODIN, S., FIET, N., GODET, A., MATERA, V., WESTERMANN, S., CLÉMENT, A., JANSSEN, N. M. M., STILLE, P. and FÖLLMI, K. B.2009. Early Cretaceous (late Berriasian to early Aptian) palaeoceanographic change along the northwestern Tethyan margin (Vocontian Trough, southeastern France): δ13C, δ18O and Sr-isotope belemnite and whole-rock records. Cretaceous Research, 30, 1247–1262.
  • BREMER, K.1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10, 295–304.
  • BRUMMITT, R. K.2006. Am I a bony fish?Taxon, 55, 268–269.
  • BUCKMAN, S. S.18871907. A monograph of the ammonites of the Inferior Oolite Series. Palaeontological Society, 162, 1–456.
  • COURVILLE, P. and CRÔNIER, C.2003. Les hétérochronies du développement: un outil pour l’étude de la variabilité et des relations phylétiques? Exemple de Nigericeras, Ammonitina du Crétacé supérieur africain. C. R. Paleovol, 2, 535–546.
  • DAYRAT, B.2005. Ancestor-descendant relationships in the reconstruction of the Tree of Life. Paleobiology, 31, 347–353.
  • DELANOY, G. and MAGNIN, A.1994. Evolution de l’enroulement des ammonites hétéromorphes avec les événements marins. Comptes Rendu à l’Académie des Sciences, Série II, 318, 843–848.
  • DELANOY, G., BAUDOUIN, C., GONNET, R. and BERT, D.2008. Sur les faunes d’ammonites (Crétacé inférieur) du niveau glauconieux de la carrière des Trois-Vernes, près de Crest (Drôme, Sud-est de la France). Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Nice, 23, 11–65.
  • DELSOL, M.1977. Embryogenesis, Morphogenesis, Genetics and Evolution. InHECHT, M. K., GOODY, P. C. and HECHT, B. M. (eds). Advensed Study Institutes Series, 14, 120–138.
  • DOMMERGUES, J.-L., DAVID, B. and MARCHAND, D.1986. Les relations ontogénèse-phylogénèse : applications paléontologiques. Geobios, 19, 335–356.
  • DONOVAN, D. T., CALLOMON, J. H. and HOWARTH, M. K.1981. Classification of the Jurassic ammonitina. 101–155. InHOUSE, M. R. and SENOIR, J. R. (eds). The Ammonoidea: the evolution, classification, mode of life, and geological usefulness of a major fossil group. Published for the Systematic Association by Academic Press, New York, 593 pp.
  • EBACH, M. C., WILLIAMS, D. M. and MORRONE, J. J.2006. Paraphyly is bad taxonomy. Taxon, 55, 831–832.
  • ELDREDGE, N. and CRACRAFT, J.1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Method and theory in comparative biology. Columbia University Press, New York, 349 pp.
  • FARRIS, J. S.1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology, 18, 374–385.
  • FARRIS, J. S.1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology, 19, 83–92.
  • FOX, D. L., FISCHER, D. C. and LEIGHTON, L. R.1999. Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science, 248, 1816–1819.
  • GERBER, S., EBLE, G. and NEIGE, P.2008. Allometric space and allometric disparity: a developmental perspective in the macroevolutionary analysis of morphological disparity. Evolution, 62, 1450–1457.
  • GOLOBOFF, P. A.1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics, 9, 83–91.
  • GOLOBOFF, P. A., FARRIS, J. S., MARI KÄLLERSJÖ, M., OXELMAN, B., RAMIREZ, M. J. and SZUMIK, C. A.2003. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics, 19, 324–332.
  • GOLOBOFF, P. A., MATTONI, C. I. and QUINTEROS, A. S.2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics, 22, 589–601.
  • GOLOBOFF, P. A., FARRIS, J. S. and NIXON, K. C.2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 24, 774–786.
  • GOULD, S. J.1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 501 pp.
  • GUEX, J.2001. Environmental stress and atavism in ammonoid evolution. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 94, 321–328.
  • GUEX, J.2006. Reinitialization of evolutionary clocks during sublethal environmental stress in some invertebrates. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 242, 240–253.
  • HARDENBOL, J., THIERRY, J., FARLEY, M. B., JACQUIN, T. H., DE GRACIANSKY, P. C. and VAIL, P. R.1998. Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework of European Basins. In Mesozoic and Cenozoic Sequence Stratigraphy of European Basins. SEPM Special Publication, 60, 39 pp.
  • HENDRIXSON, B. E. and BOND, J. E.2009. Evaluating the efficacy of continuous quantitative characters for reconstructing the phylogeny of a morphologically homogeneous spider taxon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Antrodiaetidae, Antrodiaetus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 53, 300–313.
  • HÖRANDL, E.2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa – evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon, 55, 564–570.
  • HÖRANDL, E.2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon, 56, 1–5.
  • HÖRANDL, E. and STUESSY, T. F.2010. Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification. Taxon, 59, 1641–1653.
  • JACOBS, D. K., LANDMAN, N. H. and CHAMBERLAIN, J. A.1994. Ammonite shell shape covaries with facies and hydrodynamics: iterative evolution as a response to changes in basinal environment. Geology, 22, 905–908.
  • KAKABADZE, M. V. and HOEDEMAEKER, P. J.2010. New data on Early Cretaceous (Hauterivian-Barremian) heteromorphic ammonites from northern Germany. Scripta Geologica, 140, 1–168.
  • KENNEDY, W. J. and COBBAN, W. A.1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 17, 94 pp.
  • LANDMAN, N. H.1989. Iterative progenesis in upper Cretaceous ammonites. Palaeobiology, 15, 95–117.
  • LANDMAN, N. H. and GEYSSANT, J. R.1993. Heterochrony and ecology in Jurassic and Cretaceous Ammonites. Géobios, M.S. 15, 247–255.
  • LANDMAN, N. H., DOMMERGUES, J. L. and MARCHAND, D.1991. The complex nature of progenetic species: examples from Mesozoic ammonites. Lethaia, 24, 409–421.
  • LOPARDO, L.2005. Phylogenetic revision of the spider genus Negayan (Araneae, Anyphaenidae, Amaurobioidinae). Zoologica Scripta, 34, 245–277.
  • MASSE, J.-P. and FENERCI-MASSE, M.2011. Drowning discontinuities and stratigraphic correlation in platform carbonates. The late Barremian – early Aptian record of southeast France. Cretaceous Research, 32, 659–684.
  • MAYR, E. and BOCK, W. J.2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolution Research, 40, 169–194.
  • McARTHUR, J. M., MUTTERLOSE, J., PRICE, G. D., RAWSON, P. F., RUFELL, A. and THIRLWALL, M. F.2003. Belemnites of Valanginian, Hauterivian and Barremian age: Sr-isotope stratigraphy, composition (87Sr/86Sr, δ13C, δ18O, Na, Sr, Mg), and palaeo-oceanography. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 3220, 1–20.
  • McNAMARA, K. J.1982. Heterochrony and phylogenetic trends. Paleobiology, 8, 130–142.
  • McNAMARA, K. J.1986. A Guide to the Nomenclature of Heterochrony. Journal of Paleontology, 60, 4–13.
  • MEISTER, Ch.1989. Les ammonites du Crétacé supérieur d’Ashaka, Nigéria. Bulletin du Centre de Recherche-Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, 13, 1–84.
  • MONKS, N.1999. Cladistic analysis of Albian heteromorphy ammonites. Palaeontology, 42, 907–925.
  • MONKS, N.2002. Cladistic analysis of a problematic ammonite group: the Hamitidae (Cretaceous, Albian-Turonian) and proposals for new cladistic terms. Palaeontology, 45, 689–707.
  • MONNET, C.2005. Anisian (Middle Triassic) and Cenomanian (mid-Cretaceous) Ammonoids: biochronology, biodiversity, and evolution trends. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Univerity of Zürich, Switzerland, 706 pp.
  • NEIGE, P., ROUGET, I. and MOYNE, S.2007. Phylogenetic practices among scholars of fossil cephalopods, with special reference to cladistics. InLANDMAN, N. H., DAVIS, R. A. and MAPES, R. H. (eds). Cephalopods present and past: new insights and fresh perspectives. Springer, New York, 3–14 pp.
  • NELSON, G. and PLATNICK, N. I.1981. Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York, 567 pp.
  • PAUL, C. R. C.1982. The adequacy of the fossil record. InJOYSEY, K. A. and FRIDAY, A. E. (eds). Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London, 75–117. pp.
  • PAUL, C. R. C.1985. The adequacy of the fossil record reconsidered. InCOPE, J. C. W. and SKELTON, P. W. (eds). Evolutionary case histories from the fossil record. Special Papers on Palaeontology, 33, 7–16.
  • QUEIROZ, K. de and GAUTHIER, J.1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9 (1), 27–31.
  • RAMÍREZ, M. J.2003. The spider subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): a phylogenetic revision at generic level. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 277, 1–262.
  • REBOULET, S.2007. Diversification des ammonoids hétéromorphes: l’exemple des Himantoceras. Evolution et changements paléoenvironnementaux au Vallanginien. Bulletin de l’Association Géologique Auboise, 28, 13–35.
  • REBOULET, S.2008. Origination of Himantoceras (heteromorphic ammonoids) related to palaeoceanographic and climatic changes during the Valanginian. Berichte der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien, 74, 89–91.
  • REBOULET, S., ATROPS, F., BERT, D., BULOT, L., BUSNARDO, R., DELANOY, G. and VERMEULEN, J.2007. Compte rendu de la réunion des biostratigraphes français du Kilian Group IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonites Working Group, Digne-les-Bains (France), Mercredi 2 Mai 2007 (9H-17H). Parc St Benoît Réserve Géologique de Haute-Provence, France. Thème: zonation Hauterivien – Barrémien. Excursion book, 14 pp.
  • REBOULET, S., KLEIN, J., BARRAGAN, R., COMPANY, M., GONZALEZ-ARREOLA, C., LUKENEDER, A., RAISOSSADAT, S. N., SANDOVAL, J., SZIVES, O., TAVERA, J. M., VASICEK, Z. and VERMEULEN, J.2009. Report on the 3rd International Meeting of the IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonite Working Group, the ‘Kilian Group’ (Vienna, Austria, 15th April 2008). Cretaceous Research, 30, 496–502.
  • REBOULET, S., RAWSON, P. F., MORENO-BEDMAR, J. A., AGUIRRE-URRETA, M. B., BARRAGÁN, R., BOGOMOLOV, Y., COMPANY, M., GONZÁLEZ-ARREOLA, C., STOYANOVA, V. I., LUKENEDER, A., MATRION, B., MITTA, V., RANDRIANALY, H., VASICEK, Z., BARABOSHKIN, E. J., BERT, D., BERSAC, S., BOGDANOVA, T. N., BULOT, L. G., LATIL, J.-L., MIKHAILOVA, I. A., ROPOLO, P. and SZIVES, O.2011. Report on the 4th International Meeting of the IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonite Working Group, the “Kilian Group” (Dijon, France, 30th August 2010). Cretaceous Research, 32, 786–793.
  • RICQLES, A. de2000. Taxons, caractères et homologie. Biosystema, 18, 21–32.
  • ROUGET, I.2002. Reconstruction phylogenétique chez les ammonites : confrontation des approches cladistiques et stratigraphique. Le cas des Dayiceras (Ammonoidea, Eodeoceratoidea). Unpublished PhD Thesis, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, 284 pp.
  • ROUGET, I. and NEIGE, P.2001. Embryonic ammonoid shell features: intraspecific variation revisited. Palaeontology, 44, 53–64.
  • ROUGET, I., NEIGE, P. and DOMMERGUES, J. L.2004. L’analyse phylogénétique chez les ammonites : état des lieux et perspectives. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 175, 507–512.
  • SCHMELZ, R. M. and TIMM, T.2007. Advocating paraphyletic taxa in systematics of Clitellata. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 31, 99–108.
  • SWOFFORD, D. L. and MADDISON, W. P.1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Mathematical Biosciences, 87, 199–229.
  • SWOFFORD, D. L. and MADDISON, W. P.1992. Parsimony, character-state reconstructions, and evolutionary inferences. 186–223. InMAYDEN, R. L. (ed.). Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 969 pp.
  • WESTERMANN, G. E. G.1966. Covariation and taxonomy of the Jurassic ammonite Sonninia adicra (WAAGEN). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palontologie Abteilung, Stuttgart, 124, 289–312.
  • WESTERMANN, G. E. G.1996. Ammonoid Life and Habitat. InLANDMAN, N., TANABE, K. and DAVIS, R. A. (eds). Ammonoid paleobiology. Volume 13 of topics in geobiology. Plenum Press, New York, 608–707. pp.
  • WIEDMANN, J. and KULMANN, J.1981. Ammonoid suture in ontogeny and phylogeny. 215–255. InHOUSE, M. R. and SENOIR, J. R. (eds). The Ammonoidea: the evolution, classification, mode of life, and geological usefulness of a major fossil group. Published for the Systematic Association by Academic Press, New York, 593 pp.
  • WILMSEN, M. and MOSAVINIA, A.2010. Phenotypic plasticity and taxonomy of Schloenbachia varians (J. Sowerby, 1817) (Cretaceous Ammonoidea). Palontologische Zeitschrift, 85, 169–184.
  • WISSLER, L., WEISSERT, H., MASSE, J.-P. and BULOT, L.2002. Chemostratigraphic correlation of Barremian and lower Aptian ammonite zones and magnetic reversals. Internationnal Journal of Earth Science (Geologische Rundschau), 91, 272–279.
  • YACOBUCCI, M. M.1999. Plasticity of developmental timing as the underlying cause of high speciation rates in ammonoids. An example from the Cenomanian Western Interior Seaway of North America. InOLÓRIZ, F. and RODRIGUEZ-TOVAR, F. J. (eds). Advancing research on living and fossil cephalopods. Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York, 59–76. pp.
  • YACOBUCCI, M. M.2004. Buckman’s paradox: variability and constraints on ammonoid ornament and shell shape. Lethaia, 37, 57–69.
  • YANS, J., DUPUIS, C. H., DEJAX, J., BARBIER, F., SPAGNA, P. and QUESNEL, F.2008. La kaolinite comme marqueur climatique au Crétacé inférieur ? L’exemple des sédiments à faciès wealdien du Bassin du Wessex (Royaume-Uni), du Bassin de Mons (Belgique) et du Boulonnais (France). InDECONINCK, J.-F. and PUCÉAT, E. (eds). Réunion thématique du GFC. Les climats du Crétacé, Paris, 47–48 pp.
  • ZANDER, R. H.2007. Paraphyly and the species concept, a reply to Ebach & al. Taxon, 56, 642–644.
PalAss Go! URL: | Twitter: Share on Twitter | Facebook: Share on Facebook | Google+: Share on Google+