Skip to content Skip to navigation

Article: Is Macroevolution More Than Successive Rounds of Mircoevolution?

Publication: Palaeontology
Volume: 50
Part: 1
Publication Date: January 2007
Page(s): 75 85
Author(s): Todd Grantham
Addition Information

How to Cite

GRANTHAM, T. 2007. Is Macroevolution More Than Successive Rounds of Mircoevolution?. Palaeontology50, 1, 75–85.

Online Version Hosted By

Wiley Online Library
Get Article: Wiley Online Library [Pay-to-View Access] |


  • BEDAU, M. 1997. Weak emergence. 375–399. In TOMBERLIN, J. (ed.). Philosophical perspectives 11: mind causation and world. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 471 pp.
  • BEDAU, M. 2002. Downward causation and the autonomy of weak emergence. Principia, 6, 5–50.
  • BOCK, W. J. 1979. The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change: a reductionistic approach. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 13, 20–69.
  • BOOGERD, F. C., BRUGGEMAN, F. J., RICHARDSON, R. C., STEPHAN, A. and WESTERHOFF, H. V. 2005. Emergence and its place in nature: a case study of biochemical networks. Synthese, 145, 131–164.
  • BRANDON, R. N. 1990. Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 214 pp.
  • BROWN, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 269 pp.
  • BROWN, J. H., STEPHENS, G. C. and KAUFMAN, D. M. 1996. Geographic range: size, shape, boundaries and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597–623.
  • CASSILL, D. 2003. Rules of supply and demand regulate recruitment to food in an ant society. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 441–450.
  • CUNNINGHAM, B. 2000. The reemergence of ‘emergence’. Philosophy of Science, 68 (Proceedings), S62–S75.
  • FODOR, J. 1974. Special sciences: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese, 28, 97–115.
  • GASTON, K. J. 1998. Species range size distributions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 353, 219–230.
  • GASTON, K. J. 2003. Structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 266 pp.
  • GERARD, J., BIDEAU, E., MAUBLANC, M., LOISEL, P. and MARCHAL, C. 2002. Herd size in large herbivores: encoded in the individual or emergent? Biological Bulletin, 202, 275–282.
  • GOULD, S. J. 1980. The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology, 6, 96–118.
  • GOULD, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1433 pp.
  • GRANTHAM, T. A. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to macroevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 301–321.
  • GRANTHAM, T. A. 2002. Species selection. 1086–1087. In PAGEL, M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1205 pp.
  • GRANTHAM, T. A. 2004. The role of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction, or why is it difficult to integrate paleontological and neontological evolutionary biology? Biology and Philosophy, 19, 687–720.
  • HUNT, G., ROY, K. and JABLONSKI, D. 2005. Species level heritability reaffirmed. A comment on ‘On the heritability of geographic range sizes’. American Naturalist, 166, 129–135.
  • JABLONSKI, D. 1986. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bulletin of Marine Science, 39, 565–587.
  • JABLONSKI, D. 1988. Response [to Russell and Lindberg]. Science, 240, 969.
  • JABLONSKI, D. and HUNT, G. 2006. Larval ecology, geographic range, and species survivorship in Cretaceous mollusks: organismal vs. species-level explanations. American Naturalist, 168, 556–564.
  • JONES, K. E., PURVIS, A. and GITTLEMAN, J. L. 2003. Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. American Naturalist, 161, 601–614.
  • KIM, J. 1992. ‘Downward causation’ in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism. 119–138. In BECKERMAN, A. and FLOHR, H. J. (eds). Emergence or reduction? DeGruyter, Berlin, 315 pp.
  • KIM, J. 1999. Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.
  • KINCAID, H. 1990. Molecular biology and the unity of science. Philosophy of Science, 53, 492–513.
  • LENNON, J. J., TURNER, J. R. G. and CONNELL, D. 1997. A metapopulation model of species boundaries. Oikos, 78, 486–502.
  • MARSHALL, C. R. 1991. Estimation of taxonomic ranges from the fossil record. 19–38. In GILINSKY, N. and SIGNOR, P. (eds). Analytical paleobiology. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, TN.
  • MAYNARD SMITH, J. and SZATHMARY, E. 1995. Major transitions in evolution. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 346 pp.
  • McLAUGHLIN, B. 1992. The rise and fall of British emergentism. 49–93. In BECKERMAN, A. and FLOHR, H. J. (eds). Emergence or reduction? DeGruyter, Berlin, 315 pp.
  • McLAUGHLIN, B. 1995. Varieties of supervenience. 16–59. In SAVELLOS, E. E. and YALCIN, U. D. (eds). Supervenience: new essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 321 pp.
  • PURVIS, A., JONES, K. E. and MACE, G. M. 2000. Extinction. BioEssays, 22, 1123–1133.
  • SARKAR, S. 1998. Genetics and reductionism. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 246 pp.
  • SCHAFFNER, K. 1993. Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 617 pp.
  • SHEEHAN, P. M. 2001. History of marine biodiversity. Geological Journal, 36, 231–249.
  • SILBERSTEIN, M. and McGEEVER, J. 1999. The search for ontological emergence. Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 182–200.
  • VRBA, E. S. 1984. What is species selection? Systematic Zoology, 33, 318–328.
  • VRBA, E. S. 1989. Levels of selection and sorting with special reference to the species level. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 6, 111–168.
  • WEBB, T. J. and GASTON, K. J. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes. American Naturalist, 161, 553–566.
  • WEBB, T. J., GASTON, K. J. 2005. Heritability of geographic range sizes revisited: a reply to Hunt et al. American Naturalist, 166, 136–143.
  • WIMSATT, W. C. 1997. Aggregativity: reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science, 64, S372–S384.
PalAss Go! URL: | Twitter: Share on Twitter | Facebook: Share on Facebook | Google+: Share on Google+