Skip to content Skip to navigation

Article: Three‐dimensional soft tissue preservation revealed in the skin of a non‐avian dinosaur

Palaeontology - Vol. 63 Part 2 - Cover Image
Publication: Palaeontology
Volume: 63
Part: 2
Publication Date: March 2020
Page(s): 185 193
Author(s): Matteo Fabbri, Jasmina Wiemann, Fabio Manucci, and Derek E. G. Briggs
Addition Information

How to Cite

FABBRI, M., WIEMANN, J., MANUCCI, F., BRIGGS, D.E.G. 2020. . Palaeontology, 63, 2, 185-193. DOI: /doi/10.1111/pala.12470

Author Information

  • Matteo Fabbri - Department of Geology & Geophysics Yale University PO Box 208109 New Haven CT 06520 USA
  • Jasmina Wiemann - Department of Geology & Geophysics Yale University PO Box 208109 New Haven CT 06520 USA
  • Fabio Manucci - Geo‐Model via Abbate Tommaso 78 Altino (VE) 30020 Italy
  • Derek E. G. Briggs - Department of Geology & Geophysics Yale University PO Box 208109 New Haven CT 06520 USA

Publication History

  • Issue published online: 27 February 2020
  • Manuscript Accepted: 19 November 2019
  • Manuscript Received: 02 October 2018

Online Version Hosted By

Wiley Online Library (Free Access)
Get Article: Wiley Online Library [Free Access]

Abstract

The most commonly preserved soft tissues associated with ornithischian dinosaurs are skin remains. The apparent resistance of hadrosaur skin to decay, and its abundance in the fossil record relative to that of other tetrapods, has been attributed to factors such as thickness and composition. Here we report additional intrinsic factors within hadrosaur skin: 3D‐preserved eumelanin‐bearing bodies, dermal cells and blood vessel fragments in an organic matrix composed of protein fossilization products. The skin is much thinner than that of living mammals of similar size. It is likely that the preservation of hadrosaur skin is related to the arrangement of the layers composing it.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Matthew Davis, Guillermo Navalón, Lidya Tarhan, Jakob Vinther and Kanani Lee for discussion and access to facilities at the Yale Institute for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage (IPCH). Support was provided by the IPCH and the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. We also thank two anonymous referees and Sally Thomas for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

    Author contributions

    MF designed the project, interpreted morphology, and performed SEM and EDS analyses, JW prepared and analysed samples with Raman spectroscopy, FM reconstructed the animal, MF interpreted the data and wrote the paper with input from all the other authors.

      PalAss Go! URL: http://go.palass.org/kw5 | Twitter: Share on Twitter | Facebook: Share on Facebook | Google+: Share on Google+